Date
...
Drawings here: https://lucid.app/lucidchart/ac20d4e1-50ad-4367-b5cf-247ed9bad667/edit?viewport_loc=-301%2C-37%2C3200%2C1833%2CkgLSxXlpoGmM&invitationId=inv_de1a5e61-8edc-488a-90ee-8312f8c69cd4#
- Continue discussion - Architecture& Scenarios
- openIDL - Architecture Definition Workspace (NEW)
- Previous Discussions
- openIDL - System Requirements Table
- openIDL - Policies
- openIDL - Operating Roles
Notes:
- Notes included in Architecture Discovery Document
- Notes from 9/26-9/27 Meetings:
Technology Stack:
- Hyperledger Fabric
- Kubernetes
- NodeJS / Angular
- AWS
Tenets:
- Must Pass security standards of all carriers
- Must meet data privacy expectations of all carriers
- Cost of running the node is agreeable / reasonable / commensurate with function
Technical Directions:
- Ingestion format is the stat plan
- HDS will be a relational database (business users need to use SQL, Mongo is a non-starter)
- Standard, lowest common denominator SQL
- Denormalized and keep the tables flat
- Stored Procedures: not currently in consideration (orchestration, reviews, security implications, "a lifelong commitment")
- No executing code behind the trust plane
- clarification: SQL is NOT "executing code"
- We need to put together a deck for the teams (Security, Engineering) at the Carriers to explain this solution
Documentation:
Notes: (Notes taken live in Requirements document)
Recording:
View file |
---|
name | openIDL_ArchWG_10-03-2022_video.mp4 |
---|
height | 250 |
---|
|